S7 Moving Average

Samsung Galaxy S7 S7 Edge pris, funksjoner og spesifikasjoner Samsung Galaxy overtar Apple iPhone US sales. Galaxy S7 slår iPhone 6s forsendelser i det amerikanske markedet. Den nye Samsung Galaxy S7 lansert i februar i år sammen med Galaxy S7 kanten Her renner vi opp alle de siste nyheter om Samsung Galaxy S7, inkludert utgivelsesdato, pris, rykter og features. Samsung Galaxy S7 og Galaxy S7-kanten på et øyeblikk. Samsung Galaxy S7 og Galaxy S7 kanten lanseringsdato 21. februar. Galaxy S7 og S7 kanten på salg i UK 11 March. Galaxy S7 UK pris fra 599 inkl. Galaxy S7-pris fra 639 inkl. Samsung. Samsungs smarttelefonforsendelser har overhalet iPhone i USA, takket være sterkt salg av Galaxy S7. Ifølge forskningen fra Kantor World Panel, i de tre månedene frem til mai i år, utgjorde Samsung 37 prosent av smarttelefonsalg og Apple 29 prosent. Men blant flaggskiptelefonene var det en nærmere samtale med Galaxy S7 S7 Edge regnskapsfører 16 prosent av salget og iPhone 6s 6s Plus på 14 6 prosent. Forskningen fant at bare fem prosent av Samsung-kjøpene kom fra de som flyttet fra Apple, mens 14 prosent av Apple-kjøpere flyttet fra Samsung. I Storbritannia, Det er en tettere ting med hver regnskap for 36 prosent av salget i dette markedet.11 07 2016 Samsungs robuste Galaxy S7 Active-modell har sviktet en vannbestandighetstest, til tross for å ha en IP68-vannbestandighetsklasse. Denne sertifiseringen garanterer garantert en enhet kan overleve full nedsenkning i opptil fem fot vann i opptil 30 minutter, men S7 Active klarte ikke å leve opp til disse kravene når den ble utsatt for forsøk ved produkttestorganisasjon Consumer Reports. After å bli plassert i en tank trykket til tilsvarende fem fot vann i 30 minutter, ble skjermbildet skjult av grønne linjer, med fuktighetsbobler synlige i begge kameralinsene, sa gruppen. Etter at den første enheten mislyktes, sendte teknikere en andre enhet til samme te st Den andre enheten mislyktes, og ingen av modellene returnerte til full funksjonalitet. Samsung Galaxy S7 aktiv enhet er en av de mest robuste telefonene til dags dato og er svært motstandsdyktig mot riper og IP68-sertifisert, sier selskapet i en uttalelse til Consumer Reports, men innrømmet at det kan være en sjanse for at en defekt enhet ikke er så vanntett som det burde være, og sa at det undersøker saken. Vanntetting har vært et stort salgsargument for Samsungs Galaxy S-område, spesielt etter at det ble gjenopprettet for den nyeste generasjonen. Det er et spesielt viktig trekk ved S7 Active, som det er designet for bruk i harde, utendørs miljøer. Consumer Reports bemerket at av alle de nåværende Galaxy S7-modellene, var S7 Active den eneste til å mislykkes sin nedsenkningstest, med både S7 og S7 Edge passerer.28 06 2016 Samsung er klar til å utgjøre en begrenset utgave av Galaxy S7 Edge i tide for OL i 2016 som foregår i Brasil neste måned, Trusted Reviews reports. Et bilde som angivelig viser de nye utgavene, ble lekket av Evan Blass evleaks, med telefonene avbildet featuting de olympiske ringene logoat bunnen av baksiden sammen med gull blå detaljering rundt hjemme knappen, earpiece og kameramodul. Som rapporten notater, ble avsløret tidligere spådd av SamMobile basert på Samsungs tidligere OL-tie-in med Galaxy S line.08 06 2016 Samsung Galaxy S7 har nettopp fått et nytt tillegg, i form av Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. For de som ikke kommer over Samsungs Active Line, er de robuste versjoner av flaggskipet, designet for for bruk i alle vær og miljøer. Dette innebærer at i tillegg til S7s vanlige IP68 vann - og støvbeskyttelse, kommer S7-aktivet også med et forsterket, gummibyggende skall som er drop-proof til en høyde på fem meter Skjermen er også sannsynligvis knust, selv om vi ikke ønsker å teste det ut. Den største oppgraderingen er imidlertid på batteriet. S7 Active s-batteriet er en tredjedel større enn standard S7, noe som gir total kapasitet til 4,000mAh Dette betyr at du ikke bare kan ta det med kajakk eller slippe det ned i en kløft, men S7 Active er i stand til å drive gjennom minst en hel dag i villmarken. Det er et lite problem, men det er bare tilgjengelig i Amerika, og bare gjennom nettverksoperatør AT T Samsung har ikke avslørt når eller om S7 Active kommer til andre territorier, men basert på dårlig salg av tidligere aktive enheter, vil vi bli overrasket om det gjorde det til Europe.02 06 2016 Samsung har annonserte en ny Batman-inspirert versjon av Galaxy S7 Edge Dubbed the Injustice Edition, telefonen kommer i svart med trimmings av gull. Det er enda et Batman-symbol på baksiden. I en unboxing-video kommer telefonen med hodetelefoner, en Batman-armour - stil beskyttende sak og et virtuelt virkelighet hodesett Brukergrensesnittet har blitt endret litt for å gi det mer av et Batman tema. Det ser også ut til å inkludere et videospill med Gotham superhero. Telefonen feirer tredje årsdagen for den populære mobilen spill, rettferdighetsgudene blant oss Spillet har en samlekortmekaniker og engasjerer spillere i 3-on-3-taggkamp som har mange av DCs mest ikoniske tegn. Telefonen vil være tilgjengelig fra 13. juni. Ingen pris er angitt for smartphone Det vises bare i utvalgte områder, inkludert Kina, Singapore, Korea, Latin-Amerika og Russland. Det er for øyeblikket ikke noe ord på en britisk lansering. 17 05 2016 Samsung vil tilby nye Galaxy S7 og S7 edge-kunder en eksklusiv Gear VR-innholdspakke, noe som betyr at de kan få hendene på Samsung Gear VR-headsettet til en nedsatt pris, sammen med et gratis bunt av spill og opplevelser for å få mest mulig ut av det virtuelle virkelighetshodesettet. Innholdet i pakken er Anshar Wars 2, Darknet, Drift, Keep Snakker og ingen eksploderer, Ocean Rift og Starchart, selv om verken Oculus eller Samsung har annonsert hvor mye rabattprisen vil spare kundene på utsalgsprisen. Vår Galaxy S7 og S7-kant utfører svært godt, og viser fortsatt sterk etterspørsel etter våre premium-flaggskip, sa David Lowes, markedsføringsansvarlig hos Samsung Electronics Europe. Smarttelefonen er allerede så grunnleggende for våre liv, men å koble den sammen med et produkt som Gear VR åpner utrolige nye opplevelser som ofte er så emosjonelle som de er immersive. Med dette nye incitamentet oppmuntrer vi til bredere VR-adopsjon, slik at flere kan oppleve denne fantastiske nye teknologien for seg selv. Samsung har solgt 300.000 Gear VR-hodetelefoner i Europa hittil i år, med det virtuelle virkelighetsmarkedet satt til å vokse 168 prosent fra år til år i 2016 ifølge CCS Insight. På Oculus vil vi at folk skal oppleve noe, hvor som helst gjennom kraften i den virtuelle virkeligheten, og vi begynner å se det som skjer med Gear VR, sier Max Cohen, leder av mobil på Oculus Sammen, gir maskinvaren og programvaren den absolutt beste VR-opplevelsen på mobil tilgjengelig i dag, og vi gleder oss til å fortsette å opphisse og engasjere europeiske forbrukere.13 05 2016 Samsung Galaxy S7 og S7 Edge er satt til å lede det amerikanske smarttelefonmarkedet i andre kvartal 2016, ifølge nye data. Kantar Worldpanel har utgitt data som fremhever den pågående suksessen til Samsungs Galaxy S7, som utgjorde nesten 6 prosent av smarttelefonsalg i USA i løpet av første kvartal til tross for bare å bli utgitt 11. mars. Dette gjør S7 og S7 Edge til den femte bestselgende smarttelefon i løpet av denne perioden, og Samsungs rangering er satt til å klatre enda høyere i andre kvartal. Samme de som kjøpte enheten i mars, batterilevetid, kamerakvalitet, lagringskapasitet og prosessering hastighet ble allment kalt incentiver.07 04 2016 Samsung håper salget av Galaxy 7-smarttelefonen vil gi et 10 prosent sprang i driftsresultatet for første kvartal 2016. Den sørkoreanske telefonprodusenten forutsier at driftsresultatet nå 6 6 billioner Koreansk vunnet 3 9 milliarder mellom januar og mars i år, sammenlignet med seks billioner vunnet i samme periode i fjor. Det kommer etter at Galaxy S7 ble lansert i slutten av februar til gode vurderinger, inkludert vår egen, med modellbryte poster i smarttelefonskjermene, slik som høyeste farge nøyaktighet høyeste topp lysstyrke og høyeste skjermoppløsning. Enheten er allment antatt å selge seg godt, og Samsung vil frigjøre sine kvartalsresultater senere denne måneden.04 04 2016 Samsung Galaxy S7 har gjennomgått et pristillegg på rundt 150 I USA Ifølge CNN holder Walmart en tilbakekalling på disse telefonene og 100 på alle Apple iPhones til slutten av juni. Rabatter gjelder for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, nye fire-tommers SE, og Samsung Galaxy 6 og 7.01 04 2016 Utgivelsesdatoen for en av de største konkurrentene i Galaxy S7 s - HTC 10 sannsynligvis - har blitt annonsert som tirsdag 12. april. Det er en live stream som finner sted klokken 13 London-tid for enheten, som kan kalles HTC 10 eller HTC One M10, avhengig av hvilket rykte du lytter til. Løkene antyder at HTC 10 vil ha et nytt chassisdesign, 5 1in 2K oppløsningskjerm som støtter Super LCD, ikke AMOLED, et bakre kamera på 12 megapiksler og kommer i en rekke farger. Det forventes å være utstyrt med en Snapdragon 820-prosessor, 4 GB RAM, 32 GB internt minne med microSD-støtte og et 3000 mAh batteri. Med en forventet lansering, etter april kunngjøring, HTC er ganske sent i lanseringen av en ny telefon i år, med konkurrenter LG og Samsung - og til og med Apple - har allerede lansert telefoner i 2016. På papir er disse spesifikasjonene også ganske lik Galaxy S7, fra skjermstørrelse til lagring til kameraets spesifikasjoner, så HTC må trekke av noe ganske spesielt for å konkurrere. Post navigasjon. Galaxy S7 System bruker opp 8 GB ut av boksen, men du kan flytte apper til SD. Remember den store stinken som ble gjort om Samsung ikke tillater Android 6 0 Marshmallow s Adoptable Storage funksjonen Vel, dette er her, hvorfor folk kastet litt av en passform. Ut av esken bruker Samsung Galaxy S7 opp 8 GB av telefonens 32 GB for systemapper og TouchWiz og hva annet Samsung har forhåndsinstallert. Det er en fjerdedel av alt av den interne lagringen din, for å si det på en annen måte. Det er ikke bra. Som du kan se fra bildet ovenfor, før jeg selv fullførte installasjonen på Galaxy S7, unboxed vi den her, jeg var nede på rundt halvparten av min 32 GB lagringsplass tilgjengelig i aktualitet, viser bildet at jeg har brukt under 16 GB totalt, men jeg installerer fortsatt apper og har allerede hoppet forbi halvveismerket og har nå rundt 15 GB igjen for å bruke Hvis jeg var en typisk smarttelefoneier som holder en telefon i to år, 15GB gir ikke meg mye plass til å installere apps til. Folk klaget over mangelen på adopterbar lagring fordi de antok at tunge appinstallatører raskt ville gå tom for å installere flere apper. Hvis du ser på situasjonen min, kan det lett skje. Men etter å ha gravet rundt i lagringsinnstillingene til Galaxy S7, la jeg merke til at Samsung fortsatt lar deg flytte apps til SD-kort, akkurat som de har gjort i det siste. Ta en titt. Jeg løp gjennom denne prosessen med en rekke apper som jeg installerte gjennom Google Play som ikke var systemet apps Fra spill til flyselskaper til Google Analytics lar de meg alle flytte dem til 200 GB SD-en. Hvis jeg revet SD-kortet ut, tok det alle disse appene bort og sa at de var bundet til SD-kortet. Det er litt overraskende siden Moto X Pure Edition gjør det ikke mulig å se det selv. Så, Samsung kan bruke opptil 8 GB plass til systemapps og - tjenester, men de lar deg fortsatt flytte apps til et SD-kort for å frigjøre plass på intern partisjon Det er et godt tegn , spesielt siden du kan sette inn opp til 200 GB SD-kort i S7 eller S7 Edge. Nå kan det være en god tid å kjøpe denne 200 GB SanDisk microSD fra Amazon. Feil bedre om lagringssituasjonen. ADDITIONAL COVERAGE. Post navigasjon. Jeg har en litt annerledes problem Jeg kjøpte en 64 GB SD, men min lagringsmeny ser ikke ut til å la meg flytte noen apps til den. Jeg har ikke en skjerm som den som er vist ovenfor, og kan ikke synes å finne hvor som helst i de forskjellige menyene der det alternativet tilbys Dette gjør at telefonen egentlig er ubrukelig for meg. Ingen tvil om at jeg ikke finner noe rett foran meg, bør du se meg i en maskinvarebutikk, men muligens ikke noen forslag der ute. Jeg har ikke lykke med å flytte vilje ta noen øyeblikk 10 minutter. Dessverre virker det masse VR-spill og apps går direkte til intern lagring og mange av dem kan ikke flyttes, slik at Samsung ser ut til å ha skutt sine VR-verdensdomminasjonsplaner i foten ved å utelate adaptiv lagring. Jeg m så fast jeg har galaxen y S7 Edge med et Samsung 128GB SD-kort satt inn Jeg har formatert SD-kortet mens det er i telefonen og forsøkt å flytte apps over, men telefonen fungerer som SD-kortet ikke er satt inn. Mine apper har det gjennomsiktige SD-kortikonet ditt Telefon viser når du fjerner SD-kortet ditt etter at du har flyttet appene dine. Noen tips. Jeg klarte å flytte mange apper til SD-en, men av en eller annen grunn kan jeg ikke se filene i Utforskeren, og Lagringen er ikke vist nøyaktig. viser at det bare er 2GB på SD-en, selv om jeg har overført ca. 6GB til ting via App Manager, jeg startet telefonen også. Er dette normalt eller gjorde noe gå galt. Jeg var veldig skuffet over å finne at de deaktiverte denne funksjonen. SD-kort som skal monteres som internt lager, løser følgende problemer.1 Ikke alle appene kan flyttes til SD, du er til fordel for utvikleren 2 Selv når apper kan flyttes til SD ofte, blir de bare delvis flyttet noen av appene ligger på SD og noen på internt memorandum y 3 Cache Det vokser og vokser Apps som Pinterest bruk GB s cache Det er dobbelt whammy Ja, cachen er ryddet, men det slår formålet med en cache 4 I nesten alle tilfeller, etter at en app oppdateringer og noen apps oppdateres ofte, beveger den seg tilbake til det interne lagringsområdet, da må du manuelt flytte den tilbake til SD Dette kan være veldig kjedelig og tidkrevende avhengig av antall apper. Det er ondskapsfull loop. i har nettopp fått min nye s7-kant, det virker som mange apper ikke gi meg muligheten til å flytte til ekstern og im allerede på 32 på min interne ikke så glad noen hjelp. Vel 8gb er et skritt i riktig retning Jeg tror min s6 hadde 22 23 tilgjengelig fra en ren skifer Men det er hva som skjer når du får en bærbar merket enhet. Jeg tror det er bra at de fortsatt tillater App2sd, men nektene kan vite hvordan du gjør dette, men den generelle forbrukeren må tenke på hvordan du gjør dette. Mengden lagring igjen er latterlig. 15gb igjen er diminutive disse dager med alle app spill og mange har g otten større i størrelse Det ser alltid ut til at de får noe riktig og deretter skruer på et annet sted. Jeg antar at årsaken til at de gikk med 32gb, var å holde kostnadene for telefonen nede. Samsung gir en annen grunn til at 16GB aldri skal beskrive lagringskapasiteten av telefonen din i denne dagen og alderen Det skal bare brukes til å beskrive hvor mye RAM i datamaskinen din. Så fortell meg igjen Hvorfor fjernet de adopterbare lagringsplass Jeg ville forstå om det var uforenelighetsproblemer eller hastighetsforskjellproblemer mellom ufs og SD kort, men DETTE, de la denne funksjonen forbli Dette er i utgangspunktet en halv-ass versjon av adoptiv lagring Selv HTC A9 forlot funksjonen som er Hvorfor fjerne en gratis entusiast vennlig funksjon. Jeg kan ikke huske den nøyaktige grunnen, men Samsung og LG har begge sa at de ikke ville deaktivere adopterbar lagring, men måten Google implementerte det gjorde det for mye av et problem eller umulig å la det aktiveres. Jeg skjønner ikke om det er sant, men det virker legitimt siden LG a nd Samsung sa det samme jeg ikke ser noen fordel for dem deaktivere det, så det virker logisk at de gjorde det bare fordi de måtte. Fordi hvis du installerer et SD-kort og bruker adopterbar lagring, formaterer kortet kortet. Det ville være tonnevis av folk kaste kort med eksisterende bilder, personlige dokumenter osv. og ved et uhell slette dem. Så gjett hvem som får skylden Samsung eller LG, ikke Google S7, de begge valgte ut av det aktuelle PR-støttemardræret. OK, det forstår jeg, men det s ikke som et automatisk format-funksjon Det er et valg for brukeren å forlate det som er eller kombinere lagring Skjul det i utvikleralternativer eller noe Sannsynligvis ville ikke aktivere eller rotte med funksjonen hvis du ikke visste hva det gjør Som jeg sa at HTC har det på A9 ikke noe problem, det minste av de tre selskapene. Også jeg er sikker på at det må spørre deg om å slette kortet før du gjør. Så hvis du gjør det etter det, så er det din egen feil. Du kan ikke gjøre alt idiot-bevis eller vi vil fortsatt slå hverandre med stic ks i skogen. Funksjonen advarer brukeren om at SD-kortet skal formateres og anbefaler at brukerne sikkerhetskopierer dataene sine før de brukes som et internt lagringssystem, og de vil også anbefale å bruke funksjonen hvis kortet brukeren har sakte Med tanke på hvordan det er på lager Android, kan jeg ikke kjøpe hele PR-katastrofeteorien. Med en klarvarsel som allerede er inkludert som standard, er det brukerne feil for ikke å lese det på forhånd. Da blir du langt under vurdering av kunnskapsnivået av den gjennomsnittlige brukeren Lesere av dette forumet er IKKE den gjennomsnittlige brukeren Og jeg garanterer at hvis dette alternativet var automatisk, ville Samsungs teknisk støtte og i butikkpersonell bli oversvømt med folk som slettet deres store barns første skritt. De fleste tar SD-kortet fra den gamle telefonen og stikk den i den nye. I dette tilfellet vil alle dataene bli slettet. Det er ikke automatisk heller Du har gitt et popup-melding første gang du setter inn et kort, og det spør deg hvilken måte du planlegger å bruke den og selvfølgelig bruk som intern lagring kommer med en advarsel i beskrivelsen Hvis du ignorerer eller bruker velger å bruke som bærbar lagring, blir brukeren ikke nagged og funksjonen er fortsatt tilgjengelig i innstillingene. Kanskje jeg overrører den gjennomsnittlige joe som ikke vet om å bytte utlegger, er en ting, men jeg finner fortsatt Samsungs beslutning om å være latterlig. Hvis de så ønsket å beskytte brukerne, kunne de skjule det under utvikleralternativer. Den andre vurderingen er at jeg ikke vil ha apper og appdata på et lagringsmedium som ligger nært 50 ganger langsommere enn min ombordlagring Det er ikke på emne med det du sier jeg er enig i. De burde ha satt den i utvikleralternativer, men jeg bruker personlig ikke funksjonen for mye. For mye ytelse kompromiss og potensiell risiko for feil. Som min Nåværende S4 er 16GB, 32 er en forbedring med en gang Tenk jeg har ganske bestemt bestemt meg på S7 for oppgraderingen. Dette er gode nyheter og beroliger min største frykt. Nå eier jeg iPhone 6s Plus 128gb som min personlige og Galaxy S6 64g b som min telefonsamtale så faller ned til en 32gb-telefon er en stor avtale og et stort kompromiss Jeg foretrekker internt minne over minnekort og jeg liker at iPhone-enheten min kan holde alle mine apper, spill, bilder, filmer, musikk og musikkvideoer uten å bli tvunget til å kjøpe et minnekort Forhåpentligvis neste år samler Samsung tilbake 64gb-alternativet I stedet for å få GS7, skal jeg prøve Edge som firmaets telefon i år på grunn av det større batteriet. Bra artikkel og takk for info. Bare rot ur enhet og fjern system apps du trenger ikke. my s kompis får 98 timer på internett. to dager siden ny McLaren F1 kjøpt etter å tjene 18.512 dette var min forrige måned s lønnsslipp, og-litt over, 17k Siste måned 3 -5 hrofworka dager med ekstra åpne dører ukentlig paychecks det er virkelig det enkleste arbeidet jeg noensinne har gått med i denne 7 måneder siden og nå over 87, mer rett her o 323 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 o 323.Wait for de fantastiske nyhetene fra Apple, nei o Denne telefonen vil tilby sine standard lagring, 32g for inngangsnivåmodellen i 2016, banebrytende og foran sin tid er det snakk om at de også har oppfunnet en ting som heter stereoopptak, og 2017 kan være året de viser noe de kaller Apple hjul, som et normalt hjul, men to ganger kostnaden. Varsel, en Apple bashing kommentar, hvor originalt jeg vet at du ikke har noe godt å tilby enn de umodne angrepene på Apple, trist. OK Jeg må spørre om hvorfor ville noen betale iPhone priser for en Android-enhet som også inkluderer bloatware Enighet om å bloatware betyr vanligvis at du får produktet billigere Du kan ikke kjøpe en datamaskin med bloatware og betale samme pris som en som ikke har det Så hvorfor skulle du tro det er OK å gjøre med smartphones Noen kan si at du betaler for flere spesifikasjoner. La meg bare si at denne Android-enhetene må ha bedre spesifikasjoner enn iPhone til å utføre tilsvarende på iPhone i benchmark tester. Dette skyldes at Android OS er et langt mer strøm-sultent operativsystem enn iOS er S o i utgangspunktet disse Android-enhetene må ha disse ekstra spesifikasjonene for å konkurrere Hvis du noen gang har prøvd en Android-enhet med samme spesifikasjoner som en iDevice, vil du se hva jeg snakker om. Det er ingen grunn til å betale for å sette opp med bloatware bare fordi Samsung må bruke mer på deler for å gjøre enhetene dine til å lytte til iPhone Samsung betaler ekstra penger for å gjøre dyrere enheter fordi de ikke vil bruke pengene til å utvikle sitt eget operativsystem fra grunnen av, det er mindre strøm sulten og Tizen er ikke fra grunnen av det er basert på Android Hvis du går med mer strøm sulten OS må du mate det bedre spesifikasjoner for å utføre det er alt det er til det. IOS er forferdelig. Du har aldri eid en iDevice eller du ville ikke ha gjort den kommentaren La Jeg bryter ned alle fordelene iOS har over Android-sikkerhet, personvern, kvalitet på Apps Games og ytelsesstabilitet. IOS blir langt mindre skadelig enn Android, og mens 75 av iDevices er på iOS 9, mens omtrent halvparten av Android-brukere er på KitKat eller eldre versjoner av Android med mindre enn 10 Android-brukere på Android 6 Kvalitet på apper og spill er også bedre på iOS fordi utviklere utvikler apps-spillene på iOS og sender dem til Android Grunnen til at dette ikke bare er fordi utviklere foretrekker å bruke C over Java, men også fordi 75 av deres inntekter kommer fra iOS, hvor utallige artikler peker på begge fakta. Også det er 85 flere bugs i Android-enheter enn iOS-enheter. Android-enheter fryser mer, krasjer mer og starter på nytt enn iDevices. Fordelene Android-brukerkravet Android har over iOS er de samme grunnene til at de velger Android over iOS til å begynne med, og det er fordi de fleste som kjøper Android-enheter, ikke har råd til en iPhone. For eksempel kan Android installere sprakk apps spill uten å måtte jailbreak eller root. Alt dette betyr at Android-brukere kan t råd til å kjøpe apps spill slik at de siden laster sprekkede apps spill og så lurer på hvorfor de ender opp med skadelig programvare på enheten sin andre unnskyldning er Android-enheter har SD-kort fortell meg en forekomst kan du ta en 32 GB Android-telefon og også fylle opp et 256 GB SD-kort med apps-spill Det skjer ikke fordi halvparten av dataene forblir på det interne. Det er faktisk bedre å ha en 128 GB-enhet enn en 32 GB-enhet med et 256 SD-kort Faktum er at folk har en tendens til å kjøpe Android fordi de ikke har råd til en iPhone. Bare et fåtal er faktisk villige til å betale iPhone-priser for Android. Derfor er det derfor at Samsung lider tre rette år med fallende fortjeneste. Hvis folk generelt valgte Android for alt annet enn kostnaden Android ville ha en høyere fortjenestemargin enn iPhone ikke bare høyere brukerbase, men det gjør ikke fordi 99 99 av Android-brukere kjøper Android for pris og gjør unnskyldninger for å rettferdiggjøre å eie en 200 smarttelefon over en 650 en. Spør også FBI som er bedre å sikre ditt privatliv en iPhone eller en Android-telefon Selv om Android utgjør 85 av markedet, er iPhones alltid fokus fordi Android-enheter er langt lettere å bryte inn. Du hadde ingen fakta, bare din følelse g at ​​folk bare kjøper Android-telefoner fordi de antas billigere. Og dine kommentarer tror en grunnleggende misforståelse om hvordan Android mottar oppdateringer. IOS-brukere må vente på store oppdateringer, mens Android får hyppige oppdateringer gjennom Play Services. I mellomtiden ble det funnet at iOS var det mobile OS med de mest sårbare i 2015, med nesten 3 ganger så mange som Android Patetisk. Den eneste sannferdige delen av kommentaren din var den delen om utviklere. Resten er ren, ikke støttet bollocks. Anyone som bruker 99 99 av substantiv verb fordi dodgy konklusjon snakker rett ut av deres rumpe. First av det er mange fakta for å støtte folk bare kjøpe Android fordi de blir billigere Du kan se på den gjennomsnittlige prisen folk betaler for en Android-enhet 250 i forhold til hva den gjennomsnittlige personen betaler for en iPhone 600 Du kan se smartphone fortjeneste hvor iPhone utgjør 94 av alle globale fortjeneste Helvete fleste Android-brukere don t engang vet navnet på telefonen de har bare selskapet som gjør det jeg kan også fortsette å påpeke at de fleste Android-brukere som eier budsjett Android-telefoner, pleier å forlate Android for iPhone i øyeblikket de oppgraderer til et flaggskip, dette er et bevist faktum også. For det andre forvirrer du tjenesteoppdateringer med det faktiske operativsystemet oppdateringer Oppdateringen for Google Play Butikk teller ikke som en OS-oppdatering. Både Android og iOS får en stor oppdatering hvert år. Det skjer bare bare 10 av Android-brukere får se den store oppdateringen før neste store utgives mens 75-80 iOS Brukerne havner på det nyeste operativsystemet. Google startet også månedlige feilrettingsoppdateringer, som også ikke er en stor oppdatering, etter at Apple har gjort det i mange år med iPhone. Mens iOS hadde flere sårbarheter enn Android, hadde Android langt mer kritiske. Kritiske sårbarheter er hva som brukes av hackere Kritiske sikkerhetsproblemer og skadelig programvare er de største problemene i sikkerhet, og enhver sikkerhetsforsker vil fortelle deg det samme. Men jeg forstår at ingen av disse tingene favoriserer ditt argument, og at du du måtte rush gjennom alle de dårlige artiklene mot Android og se etter noe som favoriserer Android. Jeg kan også hente at Googles egne folk sa at Android ikke var designet for å være trygg. Og det står fortsatt i dag at Android-enheter fremdeles er langt lettere å hacke enn iPhones. Faktum er jeg vet mer om Android og iOS enn du gjør Det er hva som er veldig trist Du er en Android-bruker, men jeg vet mer om Android enn du gjør, jeg vet selv hvordan du skal rotere Android, og flash Android jeg vedder at du har ingen anelse om hvordan du gjør noe av disse tingene. Når det var siste gang Google Play Butikk ble hacket og over 85 store apper ble smittet med skadelig programvare. Da svaret er, kan Apple ikke si det 21. september 2015. Og denne tråden snakker om Samsung flaggskip, ikke en 200 forhåndsbetalt Android Samsung Selskapet som lager halvparten av de interne komponentene til din elskede IPhone fordi Apple ikke er noe annet enn et veldig effektivt markedsføringsfirma. La oss også fjerne denne sikkerhetssaken iPhone 6 var jailbroken innen 48 timer etter lanseringen Samsung S5 5 Fortsatt har ikke hatt roddnivå tilgang brudd uten å snuble Knox Det er for øyeblikket en 50 000 uanmeldt belønning på x-dev for alle som kan gjøre det Sikkerhetsnivået på et Samsung flaggskip er det samme som iPhone tenker ellers er ren fanboy. La meg få dette rett i hodet ditt denne hendelsen der 85 totale apps ble smittet, er verre enn Android som utgjør 90 av alle mobile malware. Jeg vil bryte dette ned mer. Dette i en hendelse, og det innebærer legit utviklere bruker et rogue tredjepartsverktøy fordi den offisielle var for treg til å laste ned. Så i utgangspunktet var disse appene vanligvis legitime apps av pålitelige utviklere. Android får 20-40 rogue apps i måneden i Play Store. Ikke legitiske apper som ble kompromittert, rene rogue apps som er tillatt på grunn av Google s Godkjen all politikk Nå fortell meg hva som er verre 85 infiserte legitapper som blir rengjort og er tilbake til normal eller har rogue apps som fortsetter å bli utgitt og Google beholder appen roving dem Det er riktig de rogue segene er verre Dette er grunnen til at Android utgjør 90 av alle mobile malware selv om du inkluderer den 85 app hendelsen Google selv nylig trakk 40 rogue apps og før det 20 andre Så det er 60 der og ingen var legitime apps som ble kompromittert. Som for ditt sikkerhetsargument Android har alltid vært vanskeligere å rote enn iOS har vært i jailbreak, dette er vanlig kunnskap. Det er også vanlig kunnskap enn Android er langt lettere å hacke enn iOS. Så bruker rooting vs jailbreaking å bestemme sikkerheten virker ikke virkelig, spesielt siden Android er mer utsatt ut av esken enn iOS, trenger du ikke engang å rote Android for å hacke den. Så det er ikke nødvendig. Det er ikke nødvendig. Knox-sikkerhet er overlegen til iOS Det er derfor Samsung Knox-enheter var det andre bak BlackBerry som ble godkjent for Department of Defense og Justisdepartementet. Du bruker lager Android som målepinne. Jeg snakker om Samsung og Knox Knox iOS. Andre, Google d oes IKKE ha en godkjent all policy Det er bare feil. Det er en åpen dev-plattform, men appene i Play Butikken blir skannet for virus, skadelig programvare og spionprogrammer før de slippes ut. Når du snakker om 90, først, er det ikke sant Det er mye lavere Og du tar Android og globalt hvor Android har en mye større markedsandel så åpenbart det vil få flere hendelser Spesielt med selskaper som Heuiwei får markedsandel Men Samsung låses det med Knox. We vet at du vil slå av temaet iOS vs Android og fokusere på Knox vs iOS fordi Android vs iOS gjør det ikke til fordel for din side Knox er ikke et OS, slik at du ikke kan sammenligne det med et OS også bare fordi Forsvarsdepartementet godkjenner det, gjør det ikke mer sikker Du vil se langt flere kongressmedlemmer med iPhones enn med Knox-telefoner Hmmm hvorfor er det Også også hvis Knox-telefoner er så mye sikrere hvordan kommer det når det gjelder kryptering og sikkerhetstiltak som de aldri blir nevnt Android har en høyere global markedsandel rett Hvis Knox var sikrere enn iOS, ville Android og Knox bli brann av regjeringen enn iOS rett, så hvorfor er det ikke Google s-skanning for virus, er det annerledes enn at Apple må godkjenne alle appene som går inn i AppStore, forskjellen er langt flere malware apps gjør det til Play-butikken selv nå enn AppStore, slik at effektiviteten til Googles antatte AV er tvilsom. Som for din snakk om malware selv Hvis du bare fokuserer på USA, kan du fjerne de 85 infiserte iOS-appene fra argumentet ditt fordi det bare berørte kinesiske Android-brukere. LMFAO om kongressens kommentar De gutta er de største tekniske moronene på planeten Jeg snakker DoD og DoJ, og du tar opp en 80 år gammel representasjon fra Podunk som målepinne. Du tok opp hvorfor noen ville noen betale en premium Android når de kunne få en iPhone i midten av en Samsung-diskusjon. Min dårlige Jeg trodde du ville ha et svar. Jeg forstår helt hvorfor du vil styre vekk fra Knox a nd focus on the great, unwashed Android masses But the fact remains that Knox is integrated in to the OS in Samsung flagship devices Knox is more secure than iOS Period Samsung s hardware is better, the OS is more dynamic and Knox makes it more secure. You can toss Android vs iOS babble around all you want But Samsung is at the forefront of technical innovation right now Apple makes a nice phone, no doubt But that superiority complex of yours is wholly unwarranted. If you had watched the congress hearing over security, you wouldn t have made the comment about the DoD and DoJ vs congressmen A lot of congressmen have worked in the tech field before becoming congressmen, they have far more expertise in tech security than the DoJ and DoD Matter of fact if you look at most attacks on tech security the DoD and DoJ pay someone else to do the attacks for them, they don t do them themselves Hell they can t even figure out how to open an iPhone 5c without Apple s help They know almost nothing abou t tech security when it comes to using it to protect the people or finding information, they pay hackers or try to force the companies themselves to do it instead Samsung hardware is again only better because Android is a slower OS, it s been proven time and again But keep trying to convince yourself that specs matter more than actual performance In the end you will need to have someone who knows how to do tech attacks not hire others to do it for them, when you re gonna use them as judge of what is secure and what isn t If they can t destroy security on mobile devices themselves, they re the last people I would use their opinion when it comes to what is secure. Ahhhaaaaahaha Yes Congress is chock full of tech geniuses Keep telling yourself that And what does hacking ability have to do with security standards The NSA advises the DoD on security standards and helps set them They adopted Knox before iOS because of how secure Knox is That was the point Jeez Try to keep up. Let me break down all the advantages iOS has over Android Security, Privacy, Quality of Apps Games and performance stability. Maybe on Android devices in general, but not vs Samsung Samsung is more secure with Knox The Knox container gives you absolute privacy Quality of apps Maybe at one time and in some niche markets like music development However, companies no longer develop strictly for iOS or even exclusively target iOS The majority of people own Android devices The app developers spend just as much time in on Android as iOS. We ve already covered performance Apple is playing catch up and has been since the iPhone 4S The only thing you can hang your hat on is profitability That because iSheep will flock to anything with that half eaten fruit on it Look at the Apple watch Crap battery life, not water resistant, ugly as hell yet sells millions But hey, it looks great with your Uggs and half caff latte. Like I said it s obvious you didn t watch hearing You also didn t read about how the DoD DoJ paid for a DDoS attack on Tor You don t follow along with anything The NSA also couldn t break into the iPhone 5c So much for their standards too Did it ever occur to you they want people with Android in general because it s easier to break into and they know most will associate Knox with Android Of course not But the fact is the government seems to think the iPhone is more secure than ANY android device, since it s mentioned more than Knox and Android when it comes to encryption and security, and you can t dispute it because it s a fact So many articles back it up. You also need to go back to benchmarks when looking at performance The iPhone 6s blew away the S6 in overall benchmarks, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s beat the S6 in gaming benchmarks and the iPhone 5s, 6 and iPhone 6s beat the S6 in browsing benchmarks So tell me where is this actual performance advantage of Android devices you speak of It s not showing in benchmark tests, it s not showing in stability tests either So what standard do you use to judge performance Personal opinion you wish to take as fact. I m glad you have such in depth knowledge of my background I followed the Silk Road case with that nut DPR And what those guys S waist6 the FBI and NSA did was nothing short of amazing Of course it required luck and a great deal of time But tracking a guy down who was using such great measures to conceal himself is amazing It also has absolutely NOTHING to do with what we re talking about Those same guys eventually recommended approval of iOS We re they still incompetent Of course not. The reason criminals prefer iOS is that most criminals are stupid So they choose Apple devices because they re aware of the PERCEIVED security advantage So more criminals use iOS Congratulations The fact that they aren t aware of Knox doesn t make Knox less secure You re equating popularity with better The Honda Accord is the most stolen car in the US So it s the best, right No It s just the most popular. I ll let the Geekbench test te ll they performance tale. First off it s funny how you wouldn t show how the S6 did compared to the 6s because you know the 6s is faster you instead went to the Note 5 which is newer than the 6s Didn t like the result the Galaxy S6 had did you As for security The FBI case vs Apple and this on going fight for encryption has went on since 2014 and Android is always a side note, you rarely hear Knox mentioned in any of that either When it comes to encryption and security even the government ALL branches mention iOS more than Knox and Android You hate that I know So you re gonna make excuses to justify it The reality is whether Knox is more secure than iOS for the people or not doesn t matter if the government itself has a way through it Sounds to me like Samsung gave the government the ability to disable Knox Be happy that Android companies are more willing to make their devices more vulnerable for the government thus also making them more vulnerable to hackers and other governments. Why wo uld I show the S6 vs the 6S The Note and the 6S are on the same release cycle If you really want to be unfair we could show the S7 vs the 6S. So wait, you re saying that Samsung gave the government a side door in to Knox LMAO Don t hurt your self making those ridiculous leaps in logic Full release Knox has never been breached Ever You can connect whatever ludicrous dots you see under your tin hat, but Knox is Enterprise software Samsung is never going to open a back door in business software. So now we go all the way back to your idiotic initial assertion question about why anyone would buy an Android, specifically a Samsung, when they could buy an iPhone Simple It s easily just as good if not better in almost every appreciable way Better screen, better battery life, better camera, expandable memory, water resistant That s why. First off both the S6 and 6s were released in 2015 so they are in fair comparison Matter of fact the comparison should be the S6 vs 6s and the Note 5 vs 6s Plus bu t you don t want to compare the S6 vs the 6s because you know the S6 got smoked by the 6s in benchmarks That is the only reason you don t want to compare the 2 Admit it you looked up benchmarks, saw the 6s beat the S6 and then saw the Note 5 beat the iPhone 6s and chose to use the Note 5 instead Just admit it. All I have to do is continue stating the fact that almost no one mentioned Knox when talking about security when it comes to security researchers or the government It s always about iPhones There are far more Android phones out there and I m sure there s plenty of Galaxies that the government have gotten ahold of, but seems like only the iPhones are they having issues with Why is that. My very first post never once said why would anyone buy Android, I asked why would anyone pay the same for bloatware as they would for an iPhone that doesn t There are Android devices that don t come with bloatware with as good or better features specs as the S7 So why choose the S7 over another Andr oid device of same specs features but less or no bloatware Because of the Samsung name right Makes it worth putting up with that bloatware. The iPhone 6S and the Note5 were released within a month of each other The Note5 and the S6 have the same processor The only major difference is the RAM I don t need to look up this stuff I work in the industry and know it like the back of my hand You sound like a child babbling on about admit it The point is that Samsung makes hardware and software every bit as capable as the iPhone. You make pompous claims about peerless security and are shown wrong Now you re bringing up some ridiculous anecdotal crap about who talks the most about which device as if that somehow correlates in to something significant If iOS is so secure, how come Samsung was approved before it The answer is that Knox is every bit as secure The fact that your imaginary experts aren t talking about it what does that even mean, anyway is totally irrelevant. But your original statemen t about bloatware is still just as douchy and stupid as the rest of your arguments If you buy a carrier iPhone, it has the carrier bloat on it Same with Samsung, HTC, LG, etc If you buy the unlocked version of the S6, it s just as bloat free as the non carrier version of the iPhone. Keep making up excuses that the S6 with better specs got destroyed in benchmarks by the iPhone 6s What s you re excuse it lost to the iPhone 6 in gaming benchmarks since it is newer than the iPhone 6 And please share your justification as to why the S6 is slower on browsing benchmarks to the iPhone 5s which is even older. Also the fact the iPhone is mentioned more and been proven to cause the government more issues to break into trumps any claims by the DoD that Knox is more secure The government has never been frustrated getting into an Android device whether it be an Galaxy with Knox or just Android itself Let me know when the government s actions with Knox match their claims. Oh but the iPhone doesn t come with carrier bloatware The fact you think it does shows you have never owned an iPhone I bought my iPhone from Sprint itself, not one piece of carrierware was on it This is what I mean about Android users, they have never owned an iDevice yet for some reason they think they can judge iOS based on their zero knowledge of iOS Here s facts for you based on a guy who has had both iOS and Android and from others who have actually had both not just claim it iOS is a faster OS, that s not even disputable The proof that the 6s with less specs killed the S6 in benchmarks shows that Android is less stable Android phones freezes, slowdown and reboot more often than iPhones there s even stats to back that up too The quality of apps games on iOS are also superior to the Android versions developers care more about iOS than Android thus build their apps games on iOS and port them to Android These are actual facts Matter of fact most iPhone users who switch to Android, don t stay with Android because of those things I just mentioned But I rarely see someone who has left Android for iOS go back to Android Plus if iOS users really want Android features and openness we can just jailbreak, which for the record has better tweaks than what rooted Android offers Also still more secure than most Android devices as well I personally don t need the openness of Android since I don t mind spending money on apps games I am waiting for some form of physical proof by security researchers or the government to show Knox is stronger than iOS not just a claim with no actual evidence. Oye You re exhaustively simple minded The S6 does not get destroyed by the 6S The link I posted shows the Note5 result on par with the 6S That s the same processor in the Note5 as the S6 So I m not sure where you see this destroyed thing Unless you re eating up the Boy Genius slop Then that would explain a bunch BTW, that same link shows the S7 processor mauling the 6S THAT is what destruction looks like. The fact that App le is currently involved with a high profile battle with the FBI has zero to do with the level of security in a Samsung They both use AES 256-bit ODE encryption, so how is Apple more secure. I m guilty as charged The last iPhone I owned was the iPhone 4 Company paid so I used it I thought for SURE it had carrier crap on it But apparently I m wrong That also has nothing to do with your claim that the iPhone is better Carrier subsidized Samsung has carrier bloat that s easily removed The unlocked version has none of it. I also showed you actual Geekbench 3 results Not some blowhard opinion, but actual results Where is this superiority you speak of. Stability Try again Here s the actual facts from the last conclusive tests Apparently, iOS 8 crashes slightly more often than Lollipop, having a 2 2 crash rate compared to Android 5 s 2 0 rate iOS 8 also loses when compared to the previous release iOS 7 had a 1 9 crash rate , while Lollipop beats bot KitKat and Ice Cream Sandwich, each having 2 6 crash rates That s from BGR, a notorious Apple fanboy site. So there s your actual facts Not innuendo, not suppositions, but actual facts Sorry You lose Samsung is every bit as capable as iPhone And you don t have to have a Napoleon complex to own one. Again you can t find hard evidence to state your case that Knox is more secure outside of XDA bounty and a claim from the DoD Even though the phones that the FBI are having a hard time breaking into are not Galaxy phones Also the fact the XDA bounty was only 50,000 compared to the iOS one that was a million bounty should tell you the security level difference 50,000 Knox bounty, 1,000,000 iOS bounty hmmm. Weird this says Android devices make up for 85 of all smartphone crashes and it s from this year. Don t know if you hate Android or what but here are my thoughts and I m sure some Android users would agree on. Price is a huge factor if I can get 80-90 of the functionality of a flagship phone for half the price why not Pretty easy decision f or those looking for maximum value. Don t get me wrong, I don t hate Apple I own an iPad air 2 Why Because it was cheaper The only other comparable Android tablet of the same size at the time was the xperia z tablets and it was like 5-600 So yeah price is a huge factor especially since the functionality is pretty much the same between the two OS. A lot of the Android fans probably have not used ios devices in past few years I know ios has improved a lot because I own a device, but ios was pretty bad until like ios 7 could be 6, can t remember Prior to that the OS multitasking wasn t even a thing on ios so Android was seen as the more powerful OS Now they re pretty even in terms of software capabilities. Now for a phone I chose Android If I could get a device that was cheaper and provide a more fun experience, why not I say more fun because I personally love how I can tweak much more than ios Even small things like animations I can also customize it much more Make it more personal The only way iphones look personalized is the case if you use one and the wallpapers With Android you can customize much more launchers, widgets, Roms, app drawer, etc Oh and you can change the ROM Sometimes you get bored, flash a new ROM and the fun starts all over again. Customization doesn t end in software There are hundreds or thousands of Android phones for you to choose from Each with their own design and hardware You don t have to choose from two sizes. It s a sacrifice that s worth making for many of us More security issues or what not Google is providing monthly security updates now and Samsung has knox not sure how effective it is I personally havent had any issues OS updates are an issue Some manufacturers may start to move to off contract, off carrier sales like moto and roll out faster updates Having updates to go through carriers is such pain I also agree on the bloatware issue I personally go for the near stock phones like moto, nexus, or flash cyanogen. Also they re huge Dangerou s 94 of market profit Their moves can have massive impact in tech industry I don t like that One call from Tim Cook and I would need to use an adapter to plug in my 3 5mm headphones for the 7 If they make that move I will hate them forever companies will follow because of their massive influence. I actually don t have an issue with Android itself Matter of fact my initial post was more a question about just one smartphone I actually had an Android phone before I had an iPhone I had a Motorola Cliq which came out before the first Droid phone The reason I left Android is because I could not see a reason to pay a premium price to get less performance My iPod Touch 2G got more updates than my Cliq even though it was older Games ran smoother on my iPod Touch than my Cliq as well There s just something wrong when an older device runs better and does better with games than a newer device I actually got a Kindle Fire 5G, and it s so much slower than my iPhone 6 Plus, I actually haven t used it in over a month As for profit Android companies have themselves to blame for this They try to put their flagship devices in a price range most Android users just aren t willing to pay And flagship devices are where companies make their money Samsung could double their smartphone profits by selling their S7 for 450 as it would not only get some budget users to choose their flagship instead but also may get some iPhone users to go with Android to save money But Samsung is determined to sell Android at iPhone prices, and it s just not gonna work As for the headphones thing I don t mind needing an adapter for my Bose headphones IF it means better quality internal speakers And rumor is they will use that extra space to add another speaker so that might be a good compromise. So your two points of reference in comparing the Apple and Android ecosystems are a phone from 6 years ago before Android even began to become popular and a recent Android tablet that you re comparing to an apple product that cost about six times as much. And now your premise is that the galaxy s7 and edge offer less performance than the iPhone offerings. Your original question was fine and the answer is because the other features of the phone outweigh the negative of the bloatware for the people who choose to purchase it I hate Touchwiz but this offering from Samsung ticked enough other boxes that I chose to buy it despite that. I think that the premise that Android flagship phones offer less performance than iPhones is false I can understand why people would value some features more than others and in that regard, that is no wrong choice but to argue that performance is flat out worse in all aspects just seems incredibly closed-minded. If you don t believe me about performance Look at how the iPhone 6 did against the S6 in gaming benchmarks The S6 is newer than the iPhone 6 yet it got smoked on gaming benchmarks Also The S6 lost to the 6s in normal benchmarks And even the iPhone 5s beat the S6 when it ca me browsing benchmarks So what do you go by to determine performance if those things don t I also know the iPhone 7 will beat the Galaxy S7 in benchmarks because the newest iPhone beats the Galaxy every single year. We weren t talking about the S6, we were talking about the S7.You re defining performance as one very specific area I m talking about everything upon which a phone can be measured Processor, camera, storage, OS features, other hardware features, screen size etc And benchmarks don t really matter to me if the end experience is nearly identical The camera on the S7 is better The processor is faster There s more RAM It has removable storage Samsung pay works with regular swipe card readers These are all areas in which the S7 arguably surpasses the iPhone There are other areas and considerations where the iPhone surpasses the S7 and when the new iPhone is released in many months, it will probably perform better But right now, to claim that the current crop of iPhones perform bet ter than the S7 in all areas is really just disingenuous. Yes, the next iPhone will probably surpass the S7 in some or most or even all of these areas but that s several months of tech development later and then the next iteration of the Galaxy will be several months of development after that and they continue to leapfrog each other. At this point, it doesn t sound like you re asking an honest question if you re incapable of believing anyone s response Why are you even posting to this forum if you refuse to accept or acknowledge people s answers to your questions. Processor and RAM only matter if it makes the phone faster and more stable Do you realize the S5 had better specs than the iPhone 6s yet wasnt faster or as stable As for the Camera argument, Android users used to act like the camera didn t matter because their excuse when the iPhone camera was better is people who care about picture quality use an actual camera not a phone Now all the sudden cameras in phones matter When the iPh one ends up with better picture quality rest assured Android users will go back to picture quality on a camera doesn t matter And I believe answers from people who have used both iOS and Android not ones who give their opinion from one side and act like Android is better cause of it I ve owned both Android and iOS so I know both sides I also follow benchmarks and all articles involving iOS, Android and Windows mobile because it s plain dumb to focus only on one aspect or one OS. Owning and using an Android phone from 6 years ago and a tablet that you compare to another device that costs over 6 times as much doesn t sound like knowing both sides very well But that aside, in a discussion about the Galaxy S7, a new device, why do you insist on talking about other devices that are one or two generations old You re talking and asking about the S7 but continually keep bringing up the S5 and S6 as examples of phones that weren t as good They probably weren t The S6 was a step down as far as I m concerned and Touchwiz on the S5 lagged terribly which is why I wasn t interested in them The S7 from all reviews doesn t seem to have any of those problems, brought back the features from the S5 that were removed, improved on them and added several new ones. And you don t believe that there s a single feature on the S7 that is better than the iPhones currently available SD card Samsung pay Several other people do and they ve explained as such If you simply don t believe them then there s no further reason to continue You re not going to convince them and you seem unable to accept that this might be a device that performs better in some, or even many aspects that an iPhone that s six months old Personally, I believe that the camera is not only better but much better Several review sites put the cameras on the current crop of flagship Android phones at or above the camera on the iPhone 6 The S6 edge is pretty consistently rated at or above the iPhone 6s and the camera on the S7 looks w ay better Samsung has a pretty good history making some of the best cameras available on phones and the includes iPhones Maybe the next iPhone will have an even better camera It s entirely possible But I m willing to bet that the camera on the S7 is better, particularly in low light, than that of the iPhone 6s. As far as cameras not mattering, there s a saying among photographers The best camera to use is the one that s with you At this point, camera phones outperform point and shoots until you start getting to the 400 price point Yes, I would obviously rather have my SLR with a prime lens of the appropriate focal length attached to take a picture, but it s far more likely that I ll have my phone when any given photo opportunity arises This has been true for years and will likely continue to be true Anyone who says or said differently is wrong. I actually have a Kindle Fire as well But you know the odd thing is most on here while they tell me I should try Android now to compare, they hav e never once owned an iDevice So they re basically telling iPhone users to try Android without willingness to try iOS, kinda defeats the purpose don t you agree Plus I have mentioned in one of my posts my sis owned an S5 and yes I have used it, it is far slower than my iPhone 6 Plus is especially when it comes to how it handles data in areas of weak coverage. I never said that the S7 didn t have better features than the iPhones currently out I m not sure how you can say Samsung Pay is better than Apple Pay though seeing as Apple Pay is more secure than Samsung Pay is It s also more widely used than Samsung Pay is SD Card I have brought up on multiple occasions that it would be useful IF you could install apps games directly to the SD Card I also know Android 6 allows for this but Samsung decided not to allow that feature in the S7 I honestly think the G series by LG are the best Android phones, Samsung is just an overhyped brand that never actually does as it s expected compared to othe r top Android flagship brands BTW LG G5 does allow for install on SD card and I will definately take a long hard look over it when it s time to upgrade I almost got a G3 instead of my iPhone 6 Plus It was a real fight for me on that What made me end up choosing the iPhone over the G3 was design and the fact I don t want to risk plopping down 600 for a smartphone that may or may not getting 2 years of updates. And yes photographers say that but Android users only took that seriously when some Android phones surpassed the iPhone in quality That said while the S6 did have better picture quality than the iPhone 6s is wasn t THAT much better that you could say this is so much better Tests have shown in general that the G series actually takes the best pictures No Samsung fanboy wants to go into that conversation though Also if you haven t noticed most photographers still use iPhones as their phone of choice for pictures iPhones are the perferred smartphone of professionals whether it be doct ors, photographers or even businesses Hell Donald Trump tells people to boycott Apple products but he still tweets with an iPhone Hell some people at Samsung have tweeted on an iPhone as well as a head of Microsoft and someone at BlackBerry Makes you wonder if they really believe their own products are as good as the iPhone if they re using the iPhone instead of their own phones they create to tweet with. The Kindle Fire is the tablet that I referenced where you compared it to an iPhone 6 I don t know why you insist on arguing what other Android users have said in the past It not really relevant to what either I m saying now or your original questions I do agree that it s hypocritical to say that one side should try the other without being willing to do so onesself but that s a straw man and irrelevant to boot And again with the previous generation of Galaxy phones who cares, they had their issues but the S7 is a different model It d be like me going on about the antennae issues on a pr evious generation of iPhone It s irrelevant But since you seem to care, I owned a 3rd generation iPod nano and my mom has an iPhone 6s that I provide tech support for so I guess I can say I ve experience on both sides. There isn t much left to say but one thing to note about the SD on the S7 is that even though it s not adaptable storage, you can move apps or at least part of the apps to the SD card That s a pleasant surprise for me though I was happy with the SD just for picture and video. LG does take great pictures and it s really subjective on whether any given LG camera is better than a corresponding Samsung camera They each have situations where they ll take a better picture over the other so it s really up to personal preference I m optimistic that the F1 7 lens combined with the larger pixels on the S7 sensor will take better low light pictures without flash which is something I tend to value more than other aspects Its why I primarily shoot with a 50 1 4 fixed lens on my SLR wit h no flash If someone else is looking for better resolution in sunny situations, they d probably be better served with a G5.And as I ve pointed out on many of my other comments, moving to SD card is not putting all storage on your SD Card A Kindle Fire I can use as an example 8 GB internal with 256 GD SD does not equal 264 GB of storage unless 90 of your SD card is used for stuff like downloaded music or videos Matter of fact you will be lucky to get 16 GB of stuff onto that SD card before your internal is full and won t let you use your SD card because of it What I m also saying is if you use Gaming Benchmarks or browser Benchmarks, the newer Android devices don t even fair well against older iPhones The Galaxy S6 couldn t even beat out the iPhone 6 in gaming The Galaxy S6 couldn t beat out the 5s in browsing So in some ways older iPhones can out perform newer Android devices Another bonus to iPhones is trade in value As for the why I insist on arguing, My very first comment was a que stion and someone else had to say iOS sux without giving a reason I was merely curious as to why someone would pay 500 or more for a smartphone that has bloatware from carriers when you can buy a device that has no carrierware at the same price like an iPhone I just don t understand paying for ads which is basically what youre doing. You do understand that the Samsung S6 and S7 are technically superior phones to the iPhone 6 and 6S, right Why would they undercut themselves It s the most popular Android device by far and not everyone wants to be led down the Apple cattle shoot. You re basing your Android experience on a phone that s more than 5 years old when Android was in its infancy BTW, look at numbers of who is moving to which device More new Android users are former iOS users than new iOS users are former Android users. You should look at how many former FLAGSHIP smartphone users have moved from iOS to Android and Android to iOS Using total numbers is an excuse since most iOS users w ho leave for Android usually go with a budget phone because they no longer can afford a flagship one Ask Samsung themselves because they see far more Android users leaving Galaxy for iPhone than the other way around As for your superior argument Do you realize Android devices have to have to have more specs to perform equally to iOS because Android is a more power hungry OS Look at benchmarks The Galaxy S5 had more specs than the iPhone 6 yet the iPhone 6 performed better Hell in gaming benchmarks, the iPhone 6 beat the Galaxy S6 In browsing benchmarks even the iPhone 5s beat the Galaxy S6.Don t know if you hate Android or what I m not a hater of Android, I actually had an Android phone before my first iPhone I just hate Android users who insult things without giving a reason why. Price is a huge factor if I can get 80-90 of the functionality of a flagship phone for half the price why not I have no issue with people choose devices based on price I have issues with people who choose devi ces based on price then go after those who have more expensive devices. Also they re huge Dangerous 94 of market profit Apple s influence in general is a good thing as they are pushing for security for the people The headphone adapter I can live with if it means better sounding internal speakers like rumors are going around. Whose security is better Samsung Knox or iOS. The problem with all this is Android users who use Knox tend to go strictly by rooting vs jailbreaking as the determination of security Even though Android has always been harder to root than iOS has been to jailbreak yet Android is easier to hack than iOS, Android users still rely on jailbreaking vs rooting Also most Android users assume that Knox and Google protect them so they don t use top notch AntiVirus They assume Knox and Google do all the work Google may scan for malware but it doesn t remove all malware Knox has zero AntiVirus built into it, absolutely none So answer your question, I would still lean toward iOS b ecause Android users have not given any evidence Knox is more secure outside of jailbreaking and rooting for their argument with security I don t see any reports that show a lower percent of Knox devices are hacked or have a lower percent of malware Until there are actual security reports to back these claims up they re only claims. Of the devices I ve owned that were rootable, I ve rooted every one. Here s the thing some Android devices never get root, and many more take months before a suitable exploit is found My Droid Turbo, for example, didn t see root until a year after release. By contrast, new versions of iOS are jailbroken WITHIN HOURS of release. Nothing else needs to be said here. I can afford the iphone maybe just 16 and 64 gb but I chose not to get one because I find it boring and lacking features and i admit I personally don t like the hype and popularity surrounding it Sure it s a great phone and very straightforward, effective, and simplistic, but I prefer android. I ve never dealt with security issues or malware. IMO, My s5 is way better than the iPhone 6s in terms of features Sure the iphone beats it in certain categories, but I get sdcard, removable battery, water resistance, an amazing amoled screen, lots of little features like multiwindow, customization without having to root, widgets, and maybe more. To each his own though. S6 did away with the removable battery and the S7 continues that Removable battery is a nice feature to have except for most people, you re gonna upgrade before you need a new battery so in most cases the removable battery is more a gimmick The SD card would be useful if you could install apps games to the SD card not just move them to the SD Card The biggest issue with the S5 is how it handle data in areas with spotty service My sis has an S5 and we went on a trip together to a place where our service just isn t good We both have Sprint Anyways my iPhone 6 Plus had signal far more often than she did She actually kept asking me to l ook things up because her phone always had no LTE or even 3G, it was out of service most of the time. You compleyely ignore the fact that you can put hundreds of gigs of media on multiple SD cards and swap them out You can carry a terabyte on just 5 cards Can t do that with an iPhone. Because that excuse doesn t work anymore Most people now stream music and movies thus making the media SD Card argument a moot point You re prolly one of those guys who illegally downloads things and stores it onto an SD Card because you either can t afford to pay for anything or are too cheap to pay for anything. I don t believe that at all I don t know anyone who streams movies on their data plan Not at 15 a gig once you go over your cap. Hahaha did you just make up those number off the top of your head Like you know there are EXACTLY 85 more bugs in Android devices That sounds like terrorist-protector Cook saying that so many iphones are being bought by people switching from Android yet somehow Apple iphon e shipments declined the last quarter and Android still has a commanding market share Something doesn t add up, Mr Cook Keep saying that Android users can t afford iphones It won t make your small dick any bigger While Android caters to all price levels, there are plenty of Android users who pay just as much for their flagship Samsungs, LG s, HTC s, Sony s, Motorola s, etc I wouldn t use that toy OS if I was given an iphone for free I m glad Apple finally figured out that if I opened up a link from an email that I might want to go back to the email app after reading the link without having to double tap the home button and switch back to it Who thought it was a great idea to have the back button in Safari on the bottom but on the top of virtually every other system app setting Thank god Android has a back button Anyway, go back to your elite phone that only 15 of people can afford Maybe one day you ll be as elite as Windows Phone and be part of the 1.Well if you actually looked things up you would know my numbers may be a percent or so off but they are facts The fact you commented without looking says everything That s the issue with Android users, they respond without looking anything up. I find it odd that you KNOW Robert didn t look up any of your facts Perhaps he did, and he could not substantiate them it appears he replied 2 hours after your comment so I just started with googling android bugs to ios and the first 5 hits are all about how ios9 could be pushing iphone users to android because it s so buggy I admit, I skimmed the articles because I am just looking for some references to the bug you stated And, I have not yet changed my search criteria, but I am still looking You could make it easier by perhaps posting the sources I d be interested to read them, especially on the bug count, of course. Android accounts for 85 of all device failures. Thanks, I ll have to download the Blannco report, because BGRs coverage is missing some details Others citing the report lead with the fact that 75 of the issues are not actual hardware or software problems, but user issues such as apps running in the background, batteries damaged from unnecessary charging, etc PC Mag cites The Blancco study analyzed an unknown number of smartphones and tablets that underwent diagnostics testing on the SmartChk platform but another article cites millions Both troubling if Blannco did not break down the study group Questions arise such as, how many devices were tested was it indeed millions or at least significant , was the study group balanced, or did it reflect market share, etc I m also having trouble finding the app itself on google play it was on itunes , so I m not sure how they are getting their android stats unless certain carriers are using the app in store for diagnostics. Their own site does show it does offer their service on both Android and iOS But they don t list a download link on the site for either So I m not sure if you have to have them do the diagnost ic test which if that is the case, I can see carriers using on returned phones that need repairs I can also see it used by services like Gazelle who buy them used then resell them It doesn t sound like they go back actual users opinions Which is good because users themselves actually complain about smallest things iOS users for instance will complain merely about a change even if it has zero affect on performance If it s something they don t like they complain They have a right to though because they spent 600 or more on their smartphone When you spend that kinda money you expect more for your money than someone who spends 200 Do you know one of the biggest reasons those who switch from Android to iOS miss most Quality of Apps and Games They love the features of Android but they tend to have a hard time looking past the apps games thing The second thing I hear mentioned is the performance like how frequently their Android device freezes compared to how often their iPhone did. Ok, got th e report, and it does not include any more information that would address concerns with their survey They do not cite how the survey group is broken down, how or if the survey size was normalized for market or user share the data came from their SmartChk app They mention the study group was gathered from millions of devices, but again, no breakdown or grouping details They state that 75 of all issues are user issues not the actual device or software , yet they do not state whether their claim of 85 android 15 iOs represents the remaining 25 that could be categorized as real issues Their approach on this study appears to be a sales piece, so you can see the correlations to how they would pitch their product They even give suggestions on resolving some of the top issues, such as battery over-charging Quote Stop over-charging the battery Users tend to excessively charge smartphones and tablets more than necessary This tends to reduce the battery s shelf life Users must remember that the b attery is designed to work for 500 full charging cycles full charging cycle means it has charged from zero percent to 100 percent Instead, a device should only be charged if there is 25 percent battery power left on it Their suggestion is not relevant to the problem because if you only use say 10 of your battery each day, you do not use a full charging cycle for 10 days assuming lithium based batteries, of course Needless to say, I would question the validity of their survey without some responses to these call outs. I don t need to look it up because I can spot BS when I read it Why waste my time looking up something that doesn t exist I ve already wasted enough time replying to your ignorant post Since you were the one who made the claim, it s your responsibility to supply your reference or just admit you made it up Breaking news Apple and Tim Cook protect 100 more terrorists than Google Look it up I read it on the internet so it must be true. The fact you wouldn t bother looking it up says everything You are a typical Android user purely opinionated with no facts and no willingness to look things up before commenting Also I guess you weren t aware of Google backing Apple in this FBI vs Apple case So I guess they support terrorism just as much as Apple they just don t know how to make an OS as secure as iOS You re prolly also not aware that Samsung spoke out about it too and sides with Apple Wow everyone supports Apple except the people who don t follow along and just form an opinion instantly It s all these others who stated facts on here about Android, I didn t force them to confirm it, I looked up what they said to validate it You won t because you want to believe what you want and even I did post the link you would say it was a lie because you want to believe your own way which has been obvious. Seriously dude, there s no point in looking up your numbers because they are all made up in that fantasy that takes place in your brain Just like all those numbers that y ou spout out on every Android article on Softpedia I don t know how you have time to even use your easily hackable iphone with all the time you spend trolling Android news sites Do you seriously think I m going to take anything you say seriously when you say things like 99 99 of Android users buy Android for cost and make excuses up to justify owning a 200 smartphone over a 650 one That stat sounds totally legit As far as the FBI vs Apple case, I know all about it I support the FBI s request for Apple to hack the PARTICULAR phone that was owned by a KNOWN TERRORIST AND KILLER if they are able to do so I don t support any request to create a universal backdoor that can be used at any time Answer this question If a member of your family was kidnapped and the kidnapper dropped their locked iphone and the police found it and wanted Apple to hack into it to see if it would help located your missing loved on, would you support or be against that Would you just say Oh well, I value the concep t of privacy too much to ask Apple to do such a thing Fortunately, since iphones have been exposed now as easily hackable, it wouldn t be a problem or moral dilemma for you Apple OWNED. Matt you need to get your facts straight Android is much more stable than iPhone and apparently the camera on Android is better too. I move apps to my SD card on my Galaxy S5, but it doesn t help with the storage issue My photos still show up as using phone memory, unless I pull the card out and most apps still use some of your phones memory, even after being put on the SD card It is also a pain in the A to move every app you download I still love my Galaxy and plan to get the 7 edge, but I wanted to clear up the misconception of you truly having more storage. Something must be wonky here I have a 16GB S5 with 9GB of pictures on a microSD card and those photos aren t affecting my internal phone storage at all I have over 9 GB of app and system data alone on the internal storage Cache data and miscellaneous files use another 4GB Still have over 3GB free Bottom line, external pictures shouldn t also use internal memory. Not satisfied because SD storage is slower and concessions shouldn t have to be made for that expensive of a device, especially when there s an option readily available built into the OS that was disabled by the manufacturer Not acceptable. If the option you are referring to is the adoptable storage I don t think that makes anything faster It would still be restricted by the speed of the sd storage. Thanks for this post It helped me to decide tonight to cancel the order for the 32 GB Galaxy S7 Edge and just hold out for the 64 GB version, that I m sure will be available in a few months Silly that they didn t offer it out of the gate. Can someone tell me if the 200 gb SD card for sale on Amazon will work for 4K video or just 1080p on down. I highly doubt it moves the bulk of the big apps to SD card It probably moves the apk, dex, and lib files to SD only which has been native in android the Kit Kat way forever But the internal app data and obb files which is where 90 of big games data lives, has to stay on the data partition unless you symlink to an SD card partition with same format Read about how link2SD app on play store works to understand what the Android 6 0 merging of SD card and internal storage is based on that the S7 has disabled in its fork of Android. Yeah, that s a pretty good thing actually Good for them to implement To be fair, Android by itself does take up a bit more space in Marshmallow On my Nexus 6, I can t push a new edit onto the phone without moving some apps out of the System folder on the new Marshmallow builds The reasoning is that the System partition has gotten a bit too full So add Marshmallow bloat to another UI layer, surprise. I thought every phone did this lol. Because my computer is for work and skyrim with 4k textures, my phone is for angry birds and making phone calls There is no realistic advantage to having fast storage in a phone, at least for me. You just proved my point though You re using an SSD for increased performance, just like I am I can t put my OS on a mechanical HDD anymore because it s unbearably slow, even in RAID0.You do want faster NAND flash Once you upgrade, you ll know what I mean when you try to use your M8 again Everything takes longer Obviously, apps that stay in RAM run at the speed of RAM, so no improvement will be seen It s when apps are loaded into RAM, updated in the Play Store, when reading writing large data files game data, large videos, etc , and loading heavy websites, that you ll begin to notice. By the time SD cards of today start to feel slow, then we will have new soc s that support the fast SD cards Again, ssd s sport much larger performance gains compared to hdd s than flash does to sd cards, at least in my experience If you feel like paying 200 for minimal amounts of storage on your phone be my guest I ll gladly spend that on a ssd, but not for my phone. Also, a ssd in a computer is far more noticeable in terms of performance than fast flash storage is in a phone, I know this because my iPhone 6s didn t really feel faster despite having the fastest flash speed available on the market compared to my m8.Except you had a Galaxy S6 and OOPS No SD Card Genius Samsung, genius. This is not reply to above, as much as reply to article. This we can move app to SD is not true for many large apps and games, practically all that download lot of data after first start Those apps store their own data on internal Android obb or Android data, and those hundreds of MB per app do NOT move to external SD when you use move app So you end up with moving only small part of such app to external SD. Unless they changed how they do that on S7 which I doubt , ability to move apps to external SD will NOT always save you enough space. You are totally right I have galaxy s7 edge, and when I tried to transfer game which size is about 2GB it transfered just several hundreds MB Would be much better to have bigger internal memory than putting micro sd which no have no point of moving programs Why they can t create clean full transferring. If Samsung offers 64GB or even 128GB I would not hesitate to choose Galaxy S7 Edge over Nexus 6P Having an option of expandable microSD with only 32GB internal storage is useless since you will have a lot of technical issues when you move apps to microSD. I am currently using 128GB Nexus 6P I insert 200GB microSD into USB-C microSD adapter and connect it into my Nexus 6P for movie, music and photos 128GB internal 9and 200GB extra external to use work so beautifully for me. Until Samsung releases 64GB or even 128GB internal, I will stay with Nexus 6P or 7 that will be released this year. The only thing I hate about Nexus 6P is fingerprint sensor on the back. Indeed and they should acquire a cheaper phone but the beauty is tmobile jump on demand can put these expensive computers in the hands of more people without breaking the bank. Isn t th is just one of the marshmallow features At least I thought I remembered reading something about this, in addition to adoptable storage. I m a bit confused too From what I gather, moving apps to SD for portable storage is no longer a native Android feature and has been superseded by adoptable storage, which isn t mandatory for 3rd party OEMs. Therefore it s up to the OEM to decide whether then want to implement Portable storage with Apps2SD as Samsung has done Portable storage without Apps2SD worst case scenario, not sure who does this Adoptable storage implemented in Moto X Pure Droid 2 Turbo. Adoptable storage will merge your internal storage with your SD, so your internal storage will be 32gb SD space There ll be no distinction between them. What is shown in this post is the good and old move to SD that has been present since ICS or GB It only moves some part of the app to the SD. That might be a better idea than Adoptable Storage for the average folks Less confusion. Me personally, I d be fine Currently my 6p I ve only used 10GB. Yes That s better Is there a noticeable difference in speed opening the apps from the microSD card vs internal storage. i would say it really depends on the app and the sd card. it s technically slower especially compared to UFS 2 but for most apps, i can t really see it being an issue provided you re using a fast SD card. I have two microSD cards waiting for the S7 edge The first one is a UFS-3, Class 10 64GB microSD card I ll use that one for 4K video recording, if I ever need to record in 4K The second one is a UFS-1, Class 10 200GB microSD card That ll be my main one for the phone for photos, apps, HD video, music, etc. i have a UFS-3 64gb card i m going to use i figure 96GB of space should be plenty, if i need more space, by then prices will have dropped and speeds will have gone up. i m pretty sure either of those cards should work fine with little to no real noticeable slowdown. Tried it on sd card and internal with insta and clash of clans an d didn t notice a real difference in load time to open the app That s not scientific or anything but I don t think it makes a real difference. I am fed up with pre-loaded bloatware I think I may be done with Samsung and will look seriously at the next Nexus device. You are wrong there In the past up to S5 that I checked , it moved core app files to SD, but problem was that those core files are small ones usually app itself If that app download lot of data AFTER it is started, that data remains to internal SD mostly in Android obb and Android data folders. In other words, for most large games that download hundreds of MB after first start, you will move only 10 of game to external SD, and all those hundreds of MB will remain on internal storage. TLDR move app to external SD may move only small part of app to external and keep MOST of large app on internal SD. Would u happen to know an app that can multi-select apps to move to SD card Clean Master has a feature that uninstalls or force closes multiple apps with minimal user interaction. Link2SD can batch move apps to SD, aside from it s main root-required feature make symlinks and move the apps to an external SD hidden partition kinda like a make-shift adoptable storage. Yikes One of the reasons I won t buy a Samsung device They ve made impressive devices so far this year though. So if you can move apps but not delete why cant you move them to the SD card and then format it to erase them. About Droid Life. Well, sometimes it is really useful to make averaging in the software, especially in cases when you use one or several analog values in calculation and then result of calculation is used elsewhere in the software In that case it is really nice to have function for averaging What I use is exponential averaging This method is mainly used in electronics and it is basically the same what RC filter does Please look at the following links. Also you can find nice discussion in Siemens forums here. Searching over the internet also give s a lot of results of how to implement this method I have created special function in LAD for execute exponential smoothing and it works like a charm. Last edited by Darius at 2 2 2017 9 10 07 AM. You can implement MAV very easily and in an efficient way The pseudocode is below. PULSE is a one-shot pulse which trigger AI acquisition. INIT F FirstScan Fill AIBuffer, AIValue Sum AIValue AIBufferLength Average AIValue. Calculation - called at fixed interval IF Pulse Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.AIBuffer is array which cover period of your avwerage, indexed from 0 to Length-1 AIPointer is an int variable STAT which points to last processed element Sum is a REAL STAT variable which holds current Sim Average is a REAL STAT which gives your averaged input. This way it will not consume too much PLC time - it is much faster than making sums in every scan. I use the moving average to detect high noise on thermocouples input in heating application the noise is present when TC is dirty and makes bad contact with the workpiece. Last edited by Piotr M at 2 2 2017 9 18 45 AM. Thank you Piotr M.- What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw - I guess you mean IF firstscan - So I shuld make this Firstscan in the calculation IF-sentence such that i just get a value when the first calculation is done Check out the bold text belo w. IF Pulse firstscan 1 Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.You can implement MAV very easily and in an efficient way The pseudocode is below. PULSE is a one-shot pulse which trigger AI acquisition. INIT F FirstScan Fill AIBuffer, AIValue Sum AIValue AIBufferLength Average AIValue. Calculation - called at fixed interval IF Pulse Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.AIBuffer is array which cover period of your avwerage, indexed from 0 to Length-1 AIPointer is an int variable STAT which points to last processed element Sum is a REAL STAT variable which holds current Sim Average is a REAL STAT which gives your averaged input. This way it will not consume too much PLC time - it is much faster than making sums in every scan. I use the moving average to detect high noise on thermocouples input in heating application the noise is present when TC is dirty and makes bad contact with the workpiece.- What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw. There is SFC21 FILL instruction which you can use.-I guess you mean IF firstscan. YES You need generate firstscan bit which is one for 1st scan of OB1 after PLC start. if First Scan is True do the Init Otherwise skip it. First Scan Generation. in OB100 Po wer-up OB set First Scan Bit to True. in LAST NETWORK of OB1 reset first scan bit to False. The posted code is a pseudocode i e how to do things You will need write it with. a proper SCL symtax i e. What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw. There is SFC21 FILL instruction which you can use That Fill instruction is not supported to my cpu s7-1200 it says I tried fillblk instead It needs 3 parameters to the function and not 2 as we are using now. FILLBLK Byte, Uint, Byte It needs IN, COUNT and OUT. Have we missed anything here It looks like FILLBLK does not support arrays.-I guess you mean IF firstscan. YES You need generate firstscan bit which is one for 1st scan of OB1 after PLC start. if First Scan is True do the Init Otherwise skip it Check code at the bottom. First Scan Generation. in OB100 Power-up OB set First Scan Bit to True. in LAST NETWORK of OB1 reset first scan bit to False. Check image the Reset is now moved to the end of OB1 btw Is it sufficient. The posted code is a pseudocode i e how to do things Y ou will need write it with. a proper SCL symtax i e.